important news
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:
November 12, 2008
Contact: Protect The Hersheys' Children, Inc.
Phone: 717-312-8900
Email: info@protecthersheychildren.org
Web: www.protecthersheychildren.org
Head of World's Largest Childcare Charity Asked to Step Down
Hershey, PA (November 12, 2008). After presiding over five years of questionable childcare policies, divisive tactics, and demoralized frontline staff, Milton Hershey School (MHS) President Johnny O'Brien has reportedly been asked to step down.
The move comes amidst continued requests from Protect The Hersheys' Children, Inc. (PHC) for an Office of Attorney General (OAG) investigation of MHS practices. PHC is a watchdog group of MHS alumni devoted to monitoring the Hershey Trust, which funds MHS, the world's largest residential childcare charity, located in Hershey, PA. Its assets total $8 billion, including 10,000 acres of land.
Construction of a $40 million experimental intake facility is said to have been among the catalysts behind the decision to ask O'Brien to step down. That facility, "Springboard Academy," was designed to house 20 children per bedroom in a disturbing manner that has baffled childcare professionals and that is at odds with the childcare vision of Hershey Trust settlors Milton & Catherine Hershey. The Hersheys mandated a homelike environment for MHS children in student homes headed by houseparent couples, eschewing congregated or dormitory settings. O'Brien has also introduced dorms for all seniors.
The announcement is to be styled as voluntary. O'Brien's actual departure is to occur at the conclusion of the current school year, with a replacement named by then.
PHC has long urged the OAG to examine questionable policies pursued under O'Brien and the MHS Board. These include child-crowding, inadequate counseling programs, bullying of frontline staff, divisive tactics, irrational infrastructure spending, use of the Hershey Trust for such partisan political activities (PHC is non-partisan) as a GOP fundraiser, diversion of childcare resources to non-child purposes, lavish compensation packages for MHS Board members and Administrators, and a host of related conduct.
Many of these problems were anticipated by the 2003-2006 Milton Hershey School Alumni Association (MHSAA) Board. That Board foresaw the MHS dysfunction that would follow rescission of a 2002 Reform Agreement between MHS and the OAG. The Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court granted MHSAA standing to seek reinstatement of these reforms, only to be reversed by the State Supreme Court. That reversal opened the door to continuation of the problems now plaguing MHS.
O'Brien was hired by the MHS Board five years ago, after a search process that some criticized as flawed from the outset. The process heavily favored O'Brien due to his having been named interim President while the search was taking place, thus disadvantaging other candidates. Moreover, O'Brien was chosen even though it was discovered that, for decades, he had falsely claimed to hold a Masters Degree in Psychology from Johns Hopkins University. O'Brien also lacked substantive administrative experience, having built a career selling leadership seminars to corporate executives from an office employing a handful of people. Some questioned whether this prepared him to lead an $8 billion residential childcare charity with 1,500 employees serving more than 1,000 children.
Nonetheless, the MHS Board selected O'Brien, whose tenure commenced with an extravagant "inauguration" ceremony that featured as processional music "When Johnny Comes Marching Home!"
One of O'Brien's first acts was to have MHS purchase a luxury S.U.V. for his use and a lavish residence valued at approximately $1,000,000. Though his predecessor was criticized for a compensation package that exceeded $400,000, O'Brien's total annual compensation was recently reported to be $664,000.
Other MHS Administrative and Board compensation has similarly mushroomed, with Board Chairperson Leroy Zimmerman reportedly amassing over $400,000 annually from his work on the charity's board.
Zimmerman was able to amass these sums because of the rescission of the 2002 Reform Agreement by the Board immediately after Zimmerman joined it. That rescission opened the door to multiple related-board appointments and other practices prohibited by the Reform Agreement. Today, Zimmerman chairs the MHS Board, the Hershey Trust Company Board, the Hershey Foundation Board, the Hershey Entertainment & Resorts Company Board, and serves on the Hershey Company Board, in a manner that the rescinded reforms would have barred. PHC has urged the OAG to restore these reforms, which also would have prohibited the increased child-crowding that has occurred under O'Brien and Zimmerman.
Spendthrift policies under O'Brien and Zimmerman extend also to astronomical construction contracts, with one building alone costing $130,000,000 simply to renovate even though it was initially projected to cost a fraction of that amount. Other questionable expenditures of MHS childcare funds include the purchase of a failing luxury golf course and renovation of its clubhouse, purportedly so that the course could be used to "buffer" MHS children from the community. Though MHS children do not use the course, O'Brien and Zimmerman are said to be frequent guests.
PHC has complained to the OAG repeatedly about these acts, echoing the alarms raised by MHSAA when it sought to restore reforms.
Meanwhile, during O'Brien's five years as MHS President - which parallel Zimmerman's tenure on the MHS Board - 910 children have been removed from the school, a figure that far exceeds the 625 children who graduated during the same period. No similar childcare facility in the country has shown such poor results though spending nearly $80,000 per child per year.
Inexplicably, O'Brien and the MHS Board have shifted blame for this attrition to MHS children themselves, claiming that those who left did not want to accept stricter policies imposed in the last five years. O'Brien - known for catchy slogans - has asserted that MHS children should show "a little less attitude and a little more gratitude." O'Brien's critics, including PHC, counter that MHS policies have been inadequate, and that the fault lies with the MHS leadership, not with the children.
In spite of nearly a quarter-billion dollars in infrastructure spending, unparalleled per-child annual costs, and executive salaries surpassing those at any other childcare charity in the world, MHS enrollment growth under O'Brien and Zimmerman has been a mere 393 children over five years. PHC asserts that at these spending levels, and with $8 billion in total resources, MHS enrollment growth should be at least several multiples higher.
The one area where O'Brien has shown great success has been in silencing opposition to MHS Board policies. For instance, the once influential Houseparents Union has been rendered virtually irrelevant today, as houseparent leaders who failed to toe the line or resisted child-crowding were driven away or silenced. Among the most egregious examples was the treatment of former Houseparent Union President Chester Ross, who, together with his wife, reportedly endured a kind of psychological warfare that eventually led to their departure. The Rosses were model houseparents revered by MHS children and universally respected. MHS is said to have been forced to pay huge sums to compensate them for damage claims allegedly arising from the O'Brien Administration's conduct. Many other frontline staff and employees have also departed MHS after growing weary of the current leadership's policies.
Similar tactics have also been used against pro-reform alumni leaders. Utilizing MHS hiring and contracting to advance his goals, O'Brien has been able to bend MHSAA to the MHS Board's will, forcing the ouster of virtually all pro-reform alumni and replacing them with what some alumni describe as quislings.
With O'Brien's departure on the horizon, the open question now is whether the MHS Board will choose a credible successor who can lead a residential childcare charity according to the highest standards. PHC asserts that until the MHS Board leadership is itself removed and governance reforms restored, MHS will be consigned to another cycle of hopeless dysfunction.
The Zimmerman Board has now removed the CEO of the Hershey Company (Richard Lenny), the CEO of the Hershey Entertainment & Resorts Company (Scott Newkam), the President of the Hershey Trust Company (Robert Vowler), and, imminently, the President of MHS (O'Brien). According to PHC, it is time for Zimmerman himself to resign and take responsibility for his five years of failed leadership.
Mike,
well said and I agree with you.
I have viewed for the past couple years that all that comes to the atteniton of alumni who are not close to Hershey are the negative issues.
I cannot remember that last time I hear a positive word about anything the BoM the association the vor, cia, dea, ntsb or any other set of letter you want to assign
, has be thanked, congraulated or just plain given a pat on the back for trying.
Once again, Mike well said!!!
To even be talking about the 2003-2004 Board seems like a waste of time, except that PHC brought it up and “congratulated” themselves. Rather than suggest the entire Board was involved in the deterioration of relations between our school and our alumni association, it was probably the work of then President John Rice and Past President Ric Fouad.
In very early 2004, a Special Edition of MHSAA News was published – about 12 or so pages – and all directed at John O’Brien. Various members of the school Administration, including John O’Brien, over the next several months, responded with letters to all members of the Alumni Association. Those letters used to be posted on the MHS website. I could not find them this morning but I was able to do a search on “Fouad” and find some of the letters since Fouad, by name, was mentioned in some of them.
Fouad and O’Brien had a big “falling out” in the October 2002 timeframe. Both are obviously “Type A” personalities. Ric claims to have carried John on his shoulders and perhaps groomed John for the job as President. I would guess that John thinks he was able to get the President’s job without Ric’s help. Maybe some day each will write a book and we will know more.
In any event, it was less the Board that caused the problems and more Ric and John – according to the school.
I will say this, and then leave it alone: I really, really wish that members of the school family were not fighting with each other. While I am sure quite a few students leave each year, that is to be expected, as MHS is not for everyone (and, in the interest of full disclosure, I was suspended 30 days prior to my graduation. I'm still suspended. What's that about,
?). But, all personalities aside, that school helps many more than it fails.
As we consistently do in this country when someone steps aside, we should thank John O'Brien heartily for what he was able to accomplish while at the helm, while hoping that the next person in charge is able to do just a little bit more.
I, like most people who are not on "a side" have a difficult time making heads nor tails of this argument at this point. I think we ALL want to protect Milton Hershey's children. Maybe we just need to leave it at that.
Moe,
To even be talking about the 2003-2004 Board seems like a waste of time, except that PHC brought it up and “congratulated” themselves. Rather than suggest the entire Board was involved in the deterioration of relations between our school and our alumni association, it was probably the work of then President John Rice and Past President Ric Fouad.
In very early 2004, a Special Edition of MHSAA News was published – about 12 or so pages – and all directed at John O’Brien. Various members of the school Administration, including John O’Brien, over the next several months, responded with letters to all members of the Alumni Association. Those letters used to be posted on the MHS website. I could not find them this morning but I was able to do a search on “Fouad” and find some of the letters since Fouad, by name, was mentioned in some of them.
Fouad and O’Brien had a big “falling out” in the October 2002 timeframe. Both are obviously “Type A” personalities. Ric claims to have carried John on his shoulders and perhaps groomed John for the job as President. I would guess that John thinks he was able to get the President’s job without Ric’s help. Maybe some day each will write a book and we will know more.
In any event, it was less the Board that caused the problems and more Ric and John – according to the school.
Moe,
The school website details (with letters to Alumni) many of the problems that were created by the MHSAA leadership – particularly during the 2003-2004 years.
On the MHSAA website I posted the following:
Who is PHC?
Hershey residents and Alumni have received numerous emails and/or “press releases” and/or “flyers” from a group called PHC. Who is PHC?
On April 2, 2007 Lee Strayer filed with the PA Department of State to set up two Corporations – one is a PA Non Stock Corporation and the other is a Non-Profit (Non Stock) Corporation. The first two links below identify them. Lee Strayer is President of both Corporations. (One Presidency is acknowledged and the other was acknowledged in a letter to the editor.)The Non-Profit is a 501 (c)(4) Corporation and is called PHC. The third link provides some information on non profits.
As noted in the third link, gifts from individuals to PHC are not tax-deductible. Gifts from companies may be tax deductible. Also note that “a 501(c)(4) could indeed engage in a little mooching off the taxpayer” – the rationale used for disclosing donors.
Lee, in the spirit of transparency, I hope you will answer a few questions:
1. Are any, and if so, what companies are donors to your non-profit PHC?
2. Who are the employees or contractors of PHC?
3. Who are the Officers and/or Board members of PHC?
4. What is the financial relationship, if any, between your two corporations?
https://www.corporations.state.pa.us/corp/soskb/corp.asp?2558046
https://www.corporations.state.pa.us/corp/soskb/corp.asp?2557974
http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=The_U.S._tax_code_and_non_profits
Alumni have asked me “who is PHC?” Hershey residents have done the same. Since PHC communicates with alumni and asks alumni for contributions, I think it is fair to find out who PHC is.
Two points
1. The 2003-2006 Board created most of the problems
This is kind of a vague statement. The 2003-2006 Board created most of WHAT problems? Did they create problems at the school? Are you saying that an alumni association executive board caused problems with the running of MHS? If so, what type of problems? I just read John O'Brien's retirement letter and got the impression that a great deal had been accomplished in his 6 years at the helm. Yet you are saying that this alumni board, with little to no power from what I have been able to see (other than to rage against the machine), "caused" the problems they forecast.
By the way, why does the Alumni Association want to "find out who PHC is"? You folks sharpening up another lawsuit?
Why not just refute their 'bogus' numbers with legitimate ones and let the intelligent readers decide who's slinging the bull?
You will find discussion of this subject in the “Debate Club” of the MHSAA website (www.mhsaa.org) The Alumni Association is trying to find out who PHC is. We know that their retention/attrition/enrollment data is bogus.
And consider this paragraph
“Many of these problems were anticipated by the 2003-2006 Milton Hershey School Alumni Association (MHSAA) Board. That Board foresaw the MHS dysfunction that would follow rescission of a 2002 Reform Agreement between MHS and the OAG. The Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court granted MHSAA standing to seek reinstatement of these reforms, only to be reversed by the State Supreme Court. That reversal opened the door to continuation of the problems now plaguing MHS.”
Two points
1. The 2003-2006 Board created most of the problems
2. The referenced 2002 Reform Agreement between MHS and the OAG was trashed by the MHSAA leadership in 2002. On the day after it was released, the then MHSAA President, in a very lengthy statement, cited 21 specific wrongs and concluded with the following
“All I can say folks is that this agreement is a tragedy: while it could have been the centerpiece of bringing us all back together after genuine reform had occurred, it is instead an invitation to more disharmony, more bitterness, more children being denied their rights, more children being harmed by absurd policies, and more battle. It smells of the hands of lawyers who sought not Mr. Hershey’s goals but the goals of others, and it has let Hershey Foods be placed on the block while ludicrously ignoring HERCO. “
Alumni were told at Homecoming 2002 that the 2002 Reform Agreement was not worth the paper it was written on.
The referenced 2003-2006 Board would then spend over three years trying to get “standing” as a means to reinstate the reforms that it trashed. How tortuous can you get?
Did PHC know this was coming before it was announced and then released their letter?
If O'Brien stepped down as a result of the PHC letter than I can't help but wonder why they didn't fight this? 
For your confidence in our intentions. Just remember there are two sides to every story.
Here is my perspective on this whole matter. I think that PHC has made this announcement to try force what is stated in the second sentence of the announcement quoted below.
"The move comes amidst continued requests from Protect The Hersheys' Children, Inc. (PHC) for an Office of Attorney General (OAG) investigation of MHS practices."
Some things in this "Press Release" are stated as truth but are they the whole truth? For instance. The attrition rate stated as "910 children have been removed from the school, a figure that far exceeds the 625 children who graduated".
Two things to consider about this fact.
First the school under the previous President - Lepley turned the school into a prep school so the children they were serving were a lot less needy in so many ways as the students that the school is currently serving. Which accounted for many kids getting out because they didn't like the changes and they have greater needs now so it's harder for them to adjust to MHS life.
Second is the attrition rate higher now that it has been in the past?
Then there is this.
"One of O'Brien's first acts was to have MHS purchase a luxury S.U.V. for his use and a lavish residence valued at approximately $1,000,000."
The house is not O'Brien's house but is owned by the school for each President to reside in. I have been in the house and if it's worth a million dollars it's because of the setting and it's historical value not because it's large or lavish. I get into a lot of million dollar houses and this house is modest by comparison.
Just in case anyone is wondering I have never had any type of two way communication with O'Brien in any form ever.
Also My wife and I are part time every other weekend Substitute Houseparents who also volunteer time. Point being the income from our positions is a small percent of our income and certainly not the biggest reason we do it.
I say these things to stave off any accusation that should come my way if my input is construed as defending him and the school because I am afraid of any recourse. If I though MHS was doing more harm than good I would not be employed by them and would be on PHC's side.
if Markus and Linda have experienced any of this, since they're employed by MHS? I know that they are both dedicated to the children they are responsible for and care a lot about them.
I hope he doesn't have any access to anymore money or descions before he leaves.








I really, really wish that members of the school family were not fighting with each other.
I think we ALL want to protect Milton Hershey's children.
Moe, Very well said. I agree, I wish the bickering could stop and we could all focus on what's important, the kids! and realize we all have different views of how to handle things and work on coming to an agreement.
Uhhh ohh, Scott brought the CIA into it!